Billionaire Invoice Miller IV says proof‑of‑stake blockchains resembling Ethereum and Solana are unlikely to “win on the finish of the day,” arguing that Bitcoin’s proof‑of‑work design confers a sturdiness different networks can’t match.
In a July 28 interview with CNBC’s “Closing Bell,” the billionaire investor stated latest US coverage strikes might give proof‑of‑stake belongings a brief‑time period enhance, however not a long-lasting edge over Bitcoin.
Miller assessed how market construction proposals outline decentralization:
“When you take a look at the best way the laws [the CLARITY Act] was written, it permits applied sciences like Ethereum and Solana blockchains to be categorized as ‘decentralized,’ when they’re truly not.”
He added that if these chains launched as we speak, “they’d undergo a a lot totally different course of.”
His core objection is governance, describing proof of stake as whoever has a giant stake within the blockchain will get to “say what occurs.”
In Miller’s view, “that’s precisely how society works as we speak, it’s probably not a technological revolution.” In contrast, he known as Bitcoin’s proof‑of‑work consensus “a sport‑altering know-how,” arguing that the vitality value tied to creating new bitcoin underpins community integrity slightly than entrenching giant token holders.
Regulatory-driven rally
Miller linked latest market positive aspects in Ethereum to Washington’s coverage calendar, pointing to the signing of the GENIUS Act and the advance of the CLARITY Act.
President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into legislation on July 18, creating the primary federal framework for greenback‑backed stablecoins.
The Home cleared it on July 17 after bundling it procedurally with CLARITY and an Anti‑CBDC measure the prior day. The Senate then authorized the consolidated model earlier than the invoice went to the White Home.
Whereas CLARITY moved as a part of that bundle to hurry flooring motion, the enrollable textual content that finally turned legislation was the GENIUS stablecoin framework.
Miller’s level is that coverage momentum can carry belongings based mostly on proof of stake, however he doubts it alters the lengthy‑run race with Bitcoin. He added:
“Folks want to start out considering what issues these varied blockchains resolve. And the reply is: most of them truly don’t resolve any actual issues apart from Bitcoin.”
Fixing accountability
He framed Bitcoin as an answer to financial accountability, mentioning its clear and immutable ledger as a solution to audit “who owns what” and the place funds are flowing.
Different chains, in his view, don’t resolve an extra drawback that Bitcoin hasn’t already addressed, and so they lack its liquidity and first‑mover momentum.
That thesis extends to company steadiness sheets:
“It’s my take that in 20 or 30 years, each firm will likely be a Bitcoin treasury firm.”
Moreover, the billionaire predicted that bond managers shopping for “Bitcoin‑regulated bonds” and fairness managers including Bitcoin‑linked exposures will outperform friends who don’t.
Miller concluded that it “stays to be seen” whether or not proof-of-stake know-how can ship a long-lasting benefit.
Talked about on this article
