Some miners at OCEAN have began making use of the Coin Age Precedence algorithm throughout block template building utilizing DATUM. Initially, Bitcoin Core initially chosen transactions to incorporate in blocks primarily based on what they’d seen first of their mempool. This logic was ultimately changed by prioritizing older cash, i.e. that had been sitting round unspent longer, over different cash. This was ultimately solely utilized to a small portion of the blockspace, after which ultimately performed away with totally across the time of Segwit. It’s nonetheless maintained in Bitcoin Knots.
I can solely speculate as to the motives of the miners doing this, however given OCEAN’s rhetoric I can guess that it has one thing to do with prioritizing “monetary” transactions over others. Even when not, even whether it is purely to assist small worth UTXO homeowners, it’s nonetheless each bit as irrational.
You possibly can partition blockspace as a miner nevertheless you need, and prioritize ordering of transactions nevertheless you would like inside these partitions, but it surely doesn’t change the truth that blockspace is a fungible good being valued on an open market. If standards apart from the feerate are used to determine which transactions to incorporate, you’ll depart cash on the desk. The one state of affairs the place that will not be true is one the place these standards had been 1:1 an identical to deciding primarily based on feerate, which might be a meaningless standards.
Making a subsection of blockspace chosen for by different standards finally accomplishes two issues: 1) leaving cash on the desk as a miner, as definitionally any significant non-feerate standards ends in amassing much less charges, and a pair of) create a bucket of blockspace submitted to aggressive “charge” pressures based on no matter completely different standards is used, with none of that stress creating direct income will increase for miners utilizing this new standards.
The brand new subsection of blockspace doesn’t finally cut back charge stress, it merely leaves them making much less cash and customers making the most of this new transaction choice standards subjected to completely different aggressive pressures miners don’t immediately profit from.
You possibly can’t disguise from the truth that blockspace is a fungible good priced on the open market. You possibly can settle for that, or you may lose cash. The one different is to futilely attempt to censor courses of transactions you don’t like, and when you occur to succeed, you destroy a core property of Bitcoin within the course of.
Mining staying decentralized, extensively distributed with many small operators, is essential for Bitcoin’s censorship resistance. It’s a disgrace to see indicators like this of such smaller miners being economically irrational, provided that it has large implications for his or her success long run.
This text is a Take. Opinions expressed are totally the creator’s and don’t essentially mirror these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.
